[libvirt PATCH 000/351] port libvirt to Meson build system

Pavel Hrdina phrdina at redhat.com
Fri Jul 17 14:10:01 UTC 2020

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 03:02:10PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 03:44:25PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 01:59:00PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > Personally I'd really like to avoid squashing them, because splitting
> > > up big patches is not merely to benefit the initial pre-merge review,
> > > but to also benefit people who need to debug stuff that's already
> > > merged and understand the scope of the intended change. So being able
> > > to look back at the changes in isolation after commit is still a big
> > > plus point.
> > 
> > I would like to avoid squashing the patches as well and in most cases I
> > would object to it as well. I only suggested that to not break git
> > bisect.
> > 
> > If we don't care about git bisect and the fact that we would not be able
> > to build libvirt correctly within these patches I'm OK with pushing it
> > without squashing.
> git bisect reliabity is key, so I reluctantly think we'll need to
> squash. I don't want to hit a pathc in this series with a bisect
> and be unable to continue the bisect due to inability to build the
> code.

I can try to rearrange the patches to not break git bisect. It will
still require some script to be used for git bisect to detect if it
should run autotools or Meson.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20200717/2b68b815/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the libvir-list mailing list