[libvirt PATCH 000/351] port libvirt to Meson build system

Daniel P. Berrangé berrange at redhat.com
Fri Jul 17 14:51:21 UTC 2020


On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:53:56AM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> So I was finally able to produce the patches to port libvirt to Meson.
> Obviously, it is a lot of changes. It might look that some of the
> patches could be squashed together but I would rather have it as
> separated as possible to make the review not that difficult.
> 
> Once we are done with review I suggest to squash all patches to single
> patch as it doesn't make sense to keep them separated as it will not be
> possible to build complete libvirt code by any of the build systems.
> Trying to achieve that would be even more challenging and the review
> would me more difficult.
> 
> The reasoning behind taking this approach is to have 1:1 conversion from
> autotools to Meson where each patch removes that part from autotools. It
> serves as a check that nothing is skipped and to make sure that the
> conversion is complete.
> 
> As probably most of us know Meson is completely different build system
> and one of the most challenging things was to deal with the fact that
> meson doesn't allow user functions and that everything has to be defined
> before it is used.
> 
> Patches are available in my Gitlab repo as well:
> 
>     git clone -b meson https://gitlab.com/phrdina/libvirt.git

I compared the contents of config.h and meson-config.h for the
before and after state, looking at wha "#define" are present.
I couple of problems appear

HAVE_DECL_SEEK_HOLE, HAVE_LIBATTR, and HAVE_LIBUTIL, WITH_PM_UTILS
were not set in meson-config.h


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list