[PATCH v1 1/8] docs: documentation and schema for the new TPM Proxy device

Daniel P. Berrangé berrange at redhat.com
Mon May 11 11:28:28 UTC 2020


On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 08:26:53AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/11/20 6:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:22:57AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> [...]
> > > It's a different guest side interface, the H_TPM_COMM hypercall
> > > instead of the other PAPR TPM interface.  To which "why?" is a very
> > > good question, but it's there now, so there's not much we can do about
> > > it.
> > 
> > That's ok. Even though its a different guest interface, it is still
> > conceptually a TPM device at a high level, so we should be reusing
> > the existing <tpm> device type. At most we should add a new backend
> > type
> 
> I think adding a new backend type is sensible. Re-using the passthrough type
> and making the differentiation with 'model', for a device that doesn't
> operate exactly as a regular vTPM but can coexist with other vTPM devices,
> will make for a lot of IFs in the code.

Currently libvirt only allows a single <tpm>, but we can trivially
lift that restriction to allow multiple if desired too.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




More information about the libvir-list mailing list