[PATCH] Don't require secdrivers to implement .domainMoveImageMetadata

[Michal Privoznik]

On 5/18/20 10:02 AM, Erik Skultety wrote:

> Yes, I know, what I meant by "unrelated" here was just the fact that in order
> to fix Apparmor, you only need the first hunk, I guess I'll be more explicit
> next time :). It's true that with the first hunk the second becomes redundant,
> but I still feel like the NOP driver should cover the full spectrum of
> operations we support, but maybe I'm trying to be overly cautious here.
> 

Well, it doesn't implement everything already. But okay, I have ACK for 
the important hunk so I will push only that one.

Thanks!
Michal