[RFC PATCH 1/2] Add support for specifying max physical address size.

Dario Faggioli dfaggioli at suse.com
Thu Nov 5 14:52:02 UTC 2020


On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 13:10 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> 
> What I think we do want though is for the <capabilities> XML to
> report the host CPU's phys bits, so mgmt apps can query this
> and use it to decide on a suitable guest limit.
> 
Right. I'll add a patch for this.

> We have ABIs for checking guest ABI compatibility, which should
> probably validate these new settings somewhree.
> 
Yes, all this capabilities thing is what I'm struggling the most with,
currently. But I'll figure it out, I'm sure :-)

Thanks and Regards
-- 
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D
http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Virtualization Software Engineer
SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20201105/8b9c117b/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list