[PATCH] qapi: deprecate drive-backup
John Snow
jsnow at redhat.com
Mon Apr 26 18:45:49 UTC 2021
On 4/26/21 2:41 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 26.04.2021 21:30, John Snow wrote:
>> On 4/26/21 2:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 09:00:36PM +0300, Vladimir
>>> Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>>> 26.04.2021 20:34, John Snow wrote:
>>>>> On 4/23/21 8:59 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>>>>> Modern way is using blockdev-add + blockdev-backup, which provides a
>>>>>> lot more control on how target is opened.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As example of drive-backup problems consider the following:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> User of drive-backup expects that target will be opened in the same
>>>>>> cache and aio mode as source. Corresponding logic is in
>>>>>> drive_backup_prepare(), where we take bs->open_flags of source.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It works rather bad if source was added by blockdev-add. Assume
>>>>>> source
>>>>>> is qcow2 image. On blockdev-add we should specify aio and cache
>>>>>> options
>>>>>> for file child of qcow2 node. What happens next:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> drive_backup_prepare() looks at bs->open_flags of qcow2 source node.
>>>>>> But there no BDRV_O_NOCAHE neither BDRV_O_NATIVE_AIO:
>>>>>> BDRV_O_NOCAHE is
>>>>>> places in bs->file->bs->open_flags, and BDRV_O_NATIVE_AIO is nowhere,
>>>>>> as file-posix parse options and simply set s->use_linux_aio.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No complaints from me, especially if Virtuozzo is on board. I would
>>>>> like to see some documentation changes alongside this deprecation,
>>>>> though.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>>>>>> <vsementsov at virtuozzo.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all! I remember, I suggested to deprecate drive-backup some
>>>>>> time ago,
>>>>>> and nobody complain.. But that old patch was inside the series with
>>>>>> other more questionable deprecations and it did not landed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's finally deprecate what should be deprecated long ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We now faced a problem in our downstream, described in commit
>>>>>> message.
>>>>>> In downstream I've fixed it by simply enabling O_DIRECT and linux_aio
>>>>>> unconditionally for drive_backup target. But actually this just shows
>>>>>> that using drive-backup in blockdev era is a bad idea. So let's
>>>>>> motivate
>>>>>> everyone (including Virtuozzo of course) to move to new interfaces
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> avoid problems with all that outdated option inheritance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> docs/system/deprecated.rst | 5 +++++
>>>>>> qapi/block-core.json | 5 ++++-
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/docs/system/deprecated.rst b/docs/system/deprecated.rst
>>>>>> index 80cae86252..b6f5766e17 100644
>>>>>> --- a/docs/system/deprecated.rst
>>>>>> +++ b/docs/system/deprecated.rst
>>>>>> @@ -186,6 +186,11 @@ Use the more generic commands
>>>>>> ``block-export-add`` and ``block-export-del``
>>>>>> instead. As part of this deprecation, where ``nbd-server-add``
>>>>>> used a
>>>>>> single ``bitmap``, the new ``block-export-add`` uses a list of
>>>>>> ``bitmaps``.
>>>>>> +``drive-backup`` (since 6.0)
>>>>>> +''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +Use ``blockdev-backup`` in pair with ``blockdev-add`` instead.
>>>>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Let's add a sphinx reference to
>>>>> https://qemu-project.gitlab.io/qemu/interop/live-block-operations.html#live-disk-backup-drive-backup-and-blockdev-backup
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) Just a thought, not a request: We also may wish to update
>>>>> https://qemu-project.gitlab.io/qemu/interop/bitmaps.html to use the
>>>>> new, preferred method. However, this doc is a bit old and is in
>>>>> need of an overhaul anyway (Especially to add the NBD pull
>>>>> workflow.) Since the doc is in need of an overhaul anyway, can we
>>>>> ask Kashyap to help us here, if he has time?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 3) Let's add a small explanation here that outlines the differences
>>>>> in using these two commands. Here's a suggestion:
>>>>>
>>>>> This change primarily separates the creation/opening process of the
>>>>> backup target with explicit, separate steps. BlockdevBackup uses
>>>>> mostly the same arguments as DriveBackup, except the "format" and
>>>>> "mode" options are removed in favor of using explicit
>>>>> "blockdev-create" and "blockdev-add" calls.
>>>>>
(Here, I accidentally used the names of the argument objects instead of
the names of the commands. It's likely better to spell out the names of
the commands instead.)
>>>>> The "target" argument changes semantics. It no longer accepts
>>>>> filenames, and will now additionally accept arbitrary node names in
>>>>> addition to device names.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 4) Also not a request: If we want to go above and beyond, it might
>>>>> be nice to spell out the exact steps required to transition from
>>>>> the old interface to the new one. Here's a (hasty) suggestion for
>>>>> how that might look:
>>>>>
>>>>> - The MODE argument is deprecated.
>>>>> - "existing" is replaced by using "blockdev-add" commands.
>>>>> - "absolute-paths" is replaced by using "blockdev-add" and
>>>>> "blockdev-create" commands.
>>>>>
>>>>> - The FORMAT argument is deprecated.
>>>>> - Format information is given to "blockdev-add"/"blockdev-create".
>>>>>
>>>>> - The TARGET argument has new semantics:
>>>>> - Filenames are no longer supported, use
>>>>> blockdev-add/blockdev-create
>>>>> as necessary instead.
>>>>> - Device targets remain supported.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Example:
>>>>>
>>>>> drive-backup $ARGS format=$FORMAT mode=$MODE target=$FILENAME becomes:
>>>>>
>>>>> (taking some liberties with syntax to just illustrate the idea ...)
>>>>>
>>>>> blockdev-create options={
>>>>> "driver": "file",
>>>>> "filename": $FILENAME,
>>>>> "size": 0,
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> blockdev-add arguments={
>>>>> "driver": "file",
>>>>> "filename": $FILENAME,
>>>>> "node-name": "Example_Filenode0"
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> blockdev-create options={
>>>>> "driver": $FORMAT,
>>>>> "file": "Example_Filenode0",
>>>>> "size": $SIZE,
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> blockdev-add arguments={
>>>>> "driver": $FORMAT,
>>>>> "file": "Example_Filenode0",
>>>>> "node-name": "Example_Formatnode0",
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> blockdev-backup arguments={
>>>>> $ARGS ...,
>>>>> "target": "Example_Formatnode0",
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good ideas. Hmm. Do you think that the whole explanation with
>>>> examples should be here, in docs/system/deprecated.rst ? Seems too
>>>> big in comparison with other deprecations
>>>
>>> No, the deprecations entry should be short.
>>>
>>> If the replacement is so complex that it requires us to provide
>>> examples,
>>> that's a sign that the replacement is insufficiently documented in its
>>> own right. IOW, add all this docs info to a suitable place in the main
>>> QEMU documentation, and just link to that from the deprecations page.
>>>
>>
>> Agree with Dan, keep the deprec section short.
>>
>> Perhaps we can add an example to the live block ops doc that shows an
>> example of how to transition and link to that example from here.
>>
>
> OK, will do
>
>
Thanks! I'm sure Eric and I can help copy-edit. It will be nice to get
rid of a confusing, mostly duplicated interface.
(Even if it is very convenient ...)
It's likely we'll want some iotests functions to help streamline the
process. Important things for me to consider while working on an API
helper library, too.
--js
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list