[PATCH v2 1/6] manpages: Document 'restrictive' mode for numatune

[Jing Qi]

Thanks for your explanation.  There is another update for the man page in
patch 4/6 and that's the final version after the whole patch. I missed that.

BR,
Jing Qi

On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 3:54 PM Michal Prívozník <mprivozn at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 12/17/21 02:35, Jing Qi wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> > Seems there is a typo of 'restrictive' instead of 'strict'  in the last
> > line of updated content. Right?
>
> Actually, no. What this patch does is document the current state of
> things. With current master, 'restrictive' is not allowed and only
> 'strict' is (the fact it doesn't work really is addressed in later
> patches in this series). Therefore, I think this patch is correct as is.
>
> But I see where you're coming from. In the end there will be only
> 'restrictive' allowed.
>
> The reason I chose to do things separately is for easier cherry pick /
> revert. Imagine at some point in future we will be able to tell QEMU to
> migrate its own memory. Then we might want to revert patch 4/6 which
> will leave us with:
>
>  For a running domain, the mode can't be changed, and the nodeset can be
>  changed only if the domain was started with mode of either \`strict' or
>  \`restrictive'.
>
>
> Hopefully, my explanation makes sense.
>
> Michal
>
>

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Jing,Qi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20211217/6f5732e1/attachment-0001.htm>