[PATCH libvirt v1] tests: add capabilities for QEMU 6.0.0 on s390x
Michal Prívozník
mprivozn at redhat.com
Thu May 13 09:39:24 UTC 2021
On 5/12/21 6:11 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 01:39:07PM +0200, Shalini Chellathurai Saroja wrote:
>> Add replies and xml files for QEMU 6.0.0 on s390x.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shalini Chellathurai Saroja<shalini at linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk<bwalk at linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski<fiuczy at linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> The replies file is removed from this patch and is available in
>> https://gitlab.com/shalinichellathurai/libvirt/-/commit/ad5883c66c80e9945be67f936e3d86ee2d107701
>>
>> tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_6.0.0.s390x.xml | 238 +
>> .../caps_6.0.0.s390x.replies | 27084 ++++++++++++++++
>> .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.0.0.s390x.xml | 3304 ++
>> ...default-video-type-s390x.s390x-latest.args | 6 +-
>> .../disk-error-policy-s390x.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
>> .../fs9p-ccw.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
>> ...tdev-subsys-mdev-vfio-ap.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
>> ...ubsys-mdev-vfio-ccw-boot.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
>> ...othreads-virtio-scsi-ccw.s390x-latest.args | 8 +-
>> ...t-cpu-kvm-ccw-virtio-2.7.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
>> ...t-cpu-kvm-ccw-virtio-4.2.s390x-latest.args | 6 +-
>> ...t-cpu-tcg-ccw-virtio-2.7.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
>> ...t-cpu-tcg-ccw-virtio-4.2.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
>> .../s390x-ccw-graphics.s390x-latest.args | 6 +-
>> .../s390x-ccw-headless.s390x-latest.args | 6 +-
>> .../vhost-vsock-ccw-auto.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
>> .../vhost-vsock-ccw-iommu.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
>> .../vhost-vsock-ccw.s390x-latest.args | 4 +-
>> 18 files changed, 30662 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_6.0.0.s390x.xml
>> create mode 100644 tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.0.0.s390x.replies
>> create mode 100644 tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.0.0.s390x.xml
>
> Overall looks reasonable, but comparing the computed capabilities
> with those for QEMU 5.2 highlights a couple of changes that I'm not
> so sure about, specifically
>
> --- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_5.2.0.s390x.xml 2021-05-12
> 10:52:29.826021415 +0200
> +++ tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.0.0.s390x.xml 2021-05-12
> 17:39:47.778445212 +0200
> @@ -87,7 +87,6 @@
> <flag name='disk-share-rw'/>
> <flag name='iscsi.password-secret'/>
> <flag name='dump-completed'/>
> - <flag name='virtio-gpu-ccw'/>
> @@ -115,7 +114,6 @@
> <flag name='iothread.poll-max-ns'/>
> <flag name='egl-headless.rendernode'/>
> <flag name='memory-backend-file.align'/>
> - <flag name='memory-backend-file.pmem'/>
>
> Because of the former I would expect the s390x-ccw-graphics xml2argv
> test to fail, but it looks like we don't do a good job at validating
> the <video> element and that QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VIRTIO_GPU_CCW in
> particular is completely unused.
>
> As for the latter there doesn't seem to be any test coverage outside
> of x86_64, so perhaps it would be a good idea to look into that?
>
pmem was reported by QEMU even if it was later denied. This was fixed by:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/def835f0da0d153b397071e6bb8f2b46f51f96b4
qemu.git $ git describe --contains def835f0da0d153b397071e6bb8f2b46f51f96b4
v6.0.0-rc0~77^2
And it's the same story with virtio-gpu-ccw:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/adcf33a504de29feb720736051dc32889314c9e6
qemu.git $ git describe --contains adcf33a504de29feb720736051dc32889314c9e6
v6.0.0-rc1~5^2~1
To me patch looks good.
Michal
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list