[PATCH v4 5/5] block: Deprecate transaction type drive-backup
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
vsementsov at virtuozzo.com
Wed Nov 3 13:38:13 UTC 2021
27.10.2021 08:22, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> John Snow <jsnow at redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:24 AM Markus Armbruster <armbru at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Several moons ago, Vladimir posted
>>>
>>> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] qapi: deprecate drive-backup
>>> Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 16:58:03 +0300
>>> Message-Id: <20210505135803.67896-4-vsementsov at virtuozzo.com>
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-05/msg01394.html
>>>
>>> with this
>>>
>>> TODO: We also need to deprecate drive-backup transaction action..
>>> But union members in QAPI doesn't support 'deprecated' feature. I tried
>>> to dig a bit, but failed :/ Markus, could you please help with it? At
>>> least by advice?
>>>
>>> This is one way to resolve it. Sorry it took so long.
>>>
>>>
>> I'll share the blame for not pushing back on the other series, but ...
>>
>>
>>> John explored another way, namely adding feature flags to union
>>> branches. Could also be useful, say to add different features to
>>> branches in multiple unions sharing the same tag enum.
>>>
>>>
>> ... this way seems simpler for now, and I trust your intuition on what's
>> easier to support as I don't have a solid grasp of the C interfaces at play
>> for actually parsing the input. We can always revisit the other thing later
>> if/when we need it.
>>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru at redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> qapi/transaction.json | 6 +++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/qapi/transaction.json b/qapi/transaction.json
>>> index d175b5f863..381a2df782 100644
>>> --- a/qapi/transaction.json
>>> +++ b/qapi/transaction.json
>>> @@ -54,6 +54,10 @@
>>> # @blockdev-snapshot-sync: since 1.1
>>> # @drive-backup: Since 1.6
>>> #
>>> +# Features:
>>> +# @deprecated: Member @drive-backup is deprecated. Use member
>>> +# @blockdev-backup instead.
>>> +#
>>> # Since: 1.1
>>> ##
>>> { 'enum': 'TransactionActionKind',
>>> @@ -62,7 +66,7 @@
>>> 'block-dirty-bitmap-disable', 'block-dirty-bitmap-merge',
>>> 'blockdev-backup', 'blockdev-snapshot',
>>> 'blockdev-snapshot-internal-sync', 'blockdev-snapshot-sync',
>>> - 'drive-backup' ] }
>>> + { 'name': 'drive-backup', 'features': [ 'deprecated' ] } ] }
>>>
>>> ##
>>> # @AbortWrapper:
>>> --
>>> 2.31.1
>>>
>>>
>> Seems pretty clean to me overall. What's the reason for wanting it to be
>> RFC?
>
> I believe it depends on the remainder of Vladimir's series.
>
Sorry, I didn't help with reviewing as promised :\
So, seems the only missing bit is v3 of my original series deprecating backup? I've sent it just now: "[PATCH v3 0/3] qapi & doc: deprecate drive-backup".
If it is OK and if it is convenient for you Markus, you can just take it into your series between 04 and 05 and pull through your tree.
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list