[PATCH v3 18/30] docstring: Fix generated documentation of virStorageVolInfoFlags

Victor Toso victortoso at redhat.com
Fri Apr 22 09:21:36 UTC 2022


Hi,

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 02:13:50AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 08:24:39PM +0200, Victor Toso wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 03:48:51PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > Actually, this paragraph is inaccurate since the commits were renamed.
> > >
> > > I'd prefer a standalone description of what's going on so since this
> > > patch is okay itself I'll probably go with:
> > >
> > > The API xml description file generator doesn't properly handle cases
> > > when there's either a single comment or mixed use of pre- and post-
> > > comments explaining the values.
> > >
> > > Modify the comments to avoid the problem and also append version
> > > information for the exposed values.
> >
> > Ack!
> 
> In addition to what Peter said, changes that are fixing the existing
> comments so that they are handled correctly by apibuild.py should not
> be mixed with changes that are adding version numbers. The former
> should happen in their own patches at the beginning of the series,
> which we should be able to push right away even as the rest of the
> changes are still being tweaked.
> 
> Patch 3/30 is an example of this being done right, both when it comes
> to its actual contents and its position in the series. This patch and
> the next few ones are not, and should be changed to look more like
> 3/30.

Yes, I agree. I missed this in the previous respin. It'll be
fixed in the next one.

Thanks!
Victor
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20220422/47a5aa69/attachment.sig>


More information about the libvir-list mailing list