[libvirt PATCH] rpm: merge mingw sub-packages into native spec

Daniel P. Berrangé berrange at redhat.com
Tue Aug 9 11:54:09 UTC 2022


On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 01:52:33PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 01:22:17PM -0400, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > One specfile containing both native and mingw builds is the
> > new best practice for Fedora. This reduces the maint burden
> > and ensures the mingw packages don't fall behind.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange at redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  .gitlab-ci.yml        |   2 +-
> >  libvirt.spec.in       | 287 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  meson.build           |  17 +--
> >  mingw-libvirt.spec.in | 327 ------------------------------------------
> >  4 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 340 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 mingw-libvirt.spec.in
> 
> The patch looks good but there are some changes not mentioned directly.
> 
> With this patch we will build MinGW packages by default on Fedora. Not
> sure if that is desirable. I would rather have it the other way around
> if it works for Fedora best practice.

Fedora has shipped the native & mingw builds for years now. This just
merges them into one spec. There's no change in what we actually build
from Fedora POV. Or am I misunderstanding what you mean ?

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


More information about the libvir-list mailing list