[PATCH 2/3] conf, docs: Add support for dummy network interface
Daniel P. Berrangé
berrange at redhat.com
Tue Aug 23 10:39:10 UTC 2022
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 03:07:17PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan at redhat.com>
> ---
> docs/formatdomain.rst | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> src/ch/ch_monitor.c | 1 +
> src/conf/domain_conf.c | 10 ++++++++++
> src/conf/domain_conf.h | 1 +
> src/conf/netdev_bandwidth_conf.c | 1 +
> src/conf/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 7 +++++++
> src/libxl/libxl_conf.c | 1 +
> src/libxl/xen_common.c | 1 +
> src/lxc/lxc_controller.c | 1 +
> src/lxc/lxc_driver.c | 3 +++
> src/lxc/lxc_process.c | 4 +++-
> src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 4 ++++
> src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 1 +
> src/qemu/qemu_hotplug.c | 3 +++
> src/qemu/qemu_interface.c | 2 ++
> src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 2 ++
> src/qemu/qemu_validate.c | 1 +
> src/vmx/vmx.c | 1 +
> tools/virsh-domain.c | 1 +
> 19 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.rst b/docs/formatdomain.rst
> index adfdd7b7a5ac..ed0d9c19593b 100644
> --- a/docs/formatdomain.rst
> +++ b/docs/formatdomain.rst
> @@ -5240,6 +5240,30 @@ which the UDP socket packets will originate from the QEMU host. :since:`Since
> </devices>
> ...
>
> +Dummy network interface
> +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> +
> +An unconnected network interface sounds pretty pointless, but can show up for
> +example with VMWare when libvirt does not have any more information to provide.
> +Two such scenarios are currently known:
> +
> +1) network interface exists, but is not connected to any existing network
> +2) the interface is connected to something known as VMWare Distributed Switch
> +
> +The difference between these two is not (yet?) discoverable by libvirt, so at
> +least the information gathered from the hypervisor is provided in the
> +element. :since:`Since 8.7.0`
> +
> +::
> +
> + ...
> + <devices>
> + <interface type='dummy'>
> + <mac address='52:54:00:22:c9:42'/>
> + </interface>
> + </devices>
> + ...
Calling this 'dummy' is not very desirable naming. Especially since
the distributed switch config is handled separately, we're just left
with the case of a network interface without any host backend.
IMHO this should just be type="none", and would likely be viable for
QEMU too.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list