[PATCH V2 9/9] kbase: Update rpm-deployment.rst with new subpackages

[Jim Fehlig]

On 12/14/22 14:55, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> On 12/14/22 11:08, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 05:31:02PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig at suse.com>
>>> ---
>>>   docs/kbase/rpm-deployment.rst | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>>   1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/docs/kbase/rpm-deployment.rst b/docs/kbase/rpm-deployment.rst
>>> index b5ee7fd827..bf2f4f5a6b 100644
>>> --- a/docs/kbase/rpm-deployment.rst
>>> +++ b/docs/kbase/rpm-deployment.rst
>>> @@ -42,14 +42,17 @@ RPM packages
>>>     stateful drivers. This package does not contain any drivers, so further
>>>     packages need to be installed to provide the desired drivers.
>>>
>>> -  In addition to the libvirtd daemon this package also contains the virtlogd,
>>> -  virtlockd and virtproxyd daemons, plus a number of helpers, configuration
>>> -  files and other bits necessary to create and admin a virtualization host.
>>> +  This package depends on libvirt-daemon-common, libvirt-daemon-lock,
>>> +  libvirt-daemon-plugin-lockd, libvirt-daemon-log, and libvirt-daemon-proxy.
>>
>> We probably want to point out that this package should *not* be
>> installed for new deployments.
>>
>> Looking at the page in its entirety, I think it would make sense to
>> have the "Deployment choices" section first and the "RPM packages"
>> section after it. That is, provide the quick recipes upfront, and
>> leave the finer details for those who are interested in them.
> 
> Agreed, but it is unrelated to this work. Can it be a separate task?

I should have read more mail before responding :-).

Regards,
Jim