[PATCH V2 1/9] spec: Move virtlockd to a new subpackage libvirt-daemon-lock

Daniel P. Berrangé berrange at redhat.com
Thu Dec 15 09:22:34 UTC 2022


On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:50:47AM -0800, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 09:31:31AM -0800, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 05:30:54PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig at suse.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange at redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  libvirt.spec.in | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > >  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna at redhat.com>
> 
> Actually, adding the libvirt-daemon-lock dependency to the sanlock
> package should happen in this patch instead of in 5/9.

No we shouldn't, sanlock has no requirement for virlockd to be
present.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


More information about the libvir-list mailing list