Libvirt Rust bindings could use some work

[Ján Tomko]

On a Monday in 2022, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 10:28:29AM +0100, Wim de With wrote:
>Licensing is a pretty fun minefield :)
>
>For example, even though libvirt-rs itself would be statically linked
>into any application that uses it, by virtue of it being a wrapper
>around the C library you'd still end up dynamically linking against
>that.
>
>I tend to agree that language bindings should follow the rest of the
>language ecosystem in terms of licensing, and for libvirt-rs
>specifically that would probably mean MIT. Perhaps we should consider
>looking into relicensing the project?
>

Alternatively, stay away from "ecosystems" that are not compatible with
copyleft.

Jano
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/attachments/20220221/7de24891/attachment-0001.sig>