[PATCH 0/2] libvirt-guests: small improvments

Jim Fehlig jfehlig at suse.com
Wed Aug 2 19:40:16 UTC 2023


On 8/1/23 08:11, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 05:06:44PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>> The first patch is trivial. I suppose the second is debatable. If I build
>> libvirt with -Dremote_default_mode=legacy but deploy modular daemons,
>> /run/libvirt/libvirt-sock is provided by virtproxyd, which may or may not
>> be running when libvirt-guests starts/stops. I added an 'After=virtproxyd.socket'
>> ordering dependency to libvirt-guests, but it hasn't fixed an issue I'm
>> seeing when using libvirt-guests+virtproxyd
>>
>> libvirt-guests.sh[2607]: Can't connect to default. Skipping
>>
> 
> In this case the connection should use the legacy mode according to the
> code.

Nod.

> I think you are running into the same thing as we were in
> 
>      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964855
> 
> and you want to have virtproxyd.service instead of virtproxyd.socket
> there.  It's complicated, but look at my commit 59d30adacd1d and comment
> #7 in the above mentioned bugzilla.

Yes, I see the same problem. Thanks for the pointer! But unless I have something 
misconfigured, the suggestions you made to the daemon docs don't work for me. My 
setup is a recent openSUSE Tumbleweed with systemd 253.7 and libvirt 9.6.0 built 
with -Dremote_default_mode=direct. The unit section of 
/etc/systemd/system/libvirt-guests.service contains

[Unit]
Description=Suspend/Resume Running libvirt Guests
Requires=virt-guest-shutdown.target
After=network.target
After=time-sync.target
After=virtqemud.service
After=virt-guest-shutdown.target

'systemctl daemon-reload' executed, virtqemud.service and socket are enabled, 
and the socket is active. With the service also active, 'systemctl stop 
libvirt-guests.service' works fine. If virtqemud.service is not running, 
'systemctl stop libvirt-guests.service' hangs as described in the bug. Killing 
the hung libvirt-guests.sh allows the stop job to complete and start job for 
virtqemud.service to begin. So for me it seems the bug still exists when using 
the default URI.

> In any case I think in such a scenario you want the libvirt-guests to
> connect to the particular daemon.  That's the reason I did not modify
> the virtproxyd in the commit and the reason the socket is not in the
> service file.

Indeed, if I set 'uri_default = "qemu:///system"' in /etc/libvirt/libvirt.conf, 
then 'systemctl stop libvirt-guests.service' succeeds even when 
virtqemud.service is not active.

Regards,
Jim



More information about the libvir-list mailing list