[libvirt PATCH 5/5] qemu: Implement support for vDPA block devices

Jonathon Jongsma jjongsma at redhat.com
Wed Aug 2 20:33:28 UTC 2023


On 7/24/23 8:05 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> As I've promised a long time ago I gave your patches some testing in
> regards of cooperation with blockjobs and snapshots.
> 
> Since the new version of the patches was not yet posted on the list I'm
> replying here including my observations from testing patches from your
> gitlab branch:
> 
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 16:15:30 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
>> Requires recent qemu with support for the virtio-blk-vhost-vdpa device
>> and the ability to pass a /dev/fdset/N path for the vdpa path (8.1.0)
>>
>> Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900770
> 
> Since this is a feature addition the 'Fixes' keyword doesn't make sense.
> Use e.g. 'Resolves' instead.
> 
> Additionally you're missing the DCO certification here.
> 
>> ---
>>   src/qemu/qemu_block.c                      | 20 ++++++++--
>>   src/qemu/qemu_domain.c                     | 25 ++++++++++++
>>   src/qemu/qemu_validate.c                   | 44 +++++++++++++++++++---
>>   tests/qemuxml2argvdata/disk-vhostvdpa.args | 35 +++++++++++++++++
>>   tests/qemuxml2argvdata/disk-vhostvdpa.xml  | 21 +++++++++++
>>   tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c                   |  2 +
>>   6 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/disk-vhostvdpa.args
>>   create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/disk-vhostvdpa.xml
> 
> [...]
> 
>> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
>> index 2f6b32e394..119e52a7d7 100644
>> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
>> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.c
>> @@ -11157,6 +11157,28 @@ qemuDomainPrepareStorageSourceFDs(virStorageSource *src,
>>   }
>>   
>>   
>> +static int
>> +qemuDomainPrepareStorageSourceVDPA(virStorageSource *src,
>> +                                   qemuDomainObjPrivate *priv)
>> +{
>> +    qemuDomainStorageSourcePrivate *srcpriv = NULL;
>> +    virStorageType actualType = virStorageSourceGetActualType(src);
>> +    int vdpafd = -1;
>> +
>> +    if (actualType != VIR_STORAGE_TYPE_VHOST_VDPA)
>> +        return 0;
>> +
>> +    if ((vdpafd = qemuVDPAConnect(src->path)) < 0)
>> +        return -1;
> 
> This function call directly touches the host filesystem, which is not
> supposed to be in the *DomainPrepareStorageSource* functions but we
> rather have a completely separate machinery in
> qemuProcessPrepareHostStorage.
> 
> Unfortunately that one doesn't yet need to handle individual backing
> chain members though.
> 
> This ensures that the code doesn't get accidentally called from tests
> even without mocking the code as the tests reimplement the functions
> differently for testing purposes.
> 
>> +
>> +    srcpriv = qemuDomainStorageSourcePrivateFetch(src);
>> +
>> +    srcpriv->fdpass = qemuFDPassNew(src->nodestorage, priv);
>> +    qemuFDPassAddFD(srcpriv->fdpass, &vdpafd, "-vdpa");
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
> 
> [...]
> 
>> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_validate.c b/src/qemu/qemu_validate.c
>> index 9dce908cfe..67b0944162 100644
>> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_validate.c
>> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_validate.c
>> @@ -3220,6 +3220,28 @@ qemuValidateDomainDeviceDefDiskTransient(const virDomainDiskDef *disk,
>>   }
>>   
>>   
>> +static int
>> +qemuValidateDomainDeviceDefDiskVhost(const virDomainDef *def,
>> +                                     virStorageType storagetype,
>> +                                     virQEMUCapsFlags flag,
>> +                                     virQEMUCaps *qemuCaps)
>> +{
>> +    const char *vhosttype = virStorageTypeToString(storagetype);
>> +
>> +    if (!virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, flag)) {
>> +        virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED,
>> +                       _("%1$s disk is not supported with this QEMU binary"),
>> +                       vhosttype);
>> +        return -1;
> 
> I'd prefer if both things this function does are duplicated inline below
> rather than passing it via arguments here. It makes it harder to follow.
> 
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (qemuValidateDomainDefVhostUserRequireSharedMemory(def, vhosttype) < 0)
>> +        return -1;
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
> 
> In my testing of the code from the new branch I've observed that
> blockjobs and snapshot creation work well thanks to libblkio, so we
> don't have to add any additional checks or limitations.
> 
> I'll still need to go ahead and finish the series removing the 'raw'
> driver when it's not necessary so that the fast-path, once implemented
> will be possible. Waiting for that is not necessary for this series as
> it works properly even with the 'raw' driver in place.
> 
> With your new version of the patches I've noticed the following
> problems:
> 
>   - After converting to store the vdpa device path in src->vdpadev:
> 
>    - rejecting of the empty disk source doesn't work for vdpa. If you use
>      <source/> in stead of the proper path, the XML will be defined but
>      broken.
> 
>    - virStorageSourceCopy doesn't copy the new member (as instructed in
>      the comment above the struct), thus block job code which uses this
>      extensively to work on the inactive definition creates broken
>      configurations.
> 
> I've also noticed that using 'qcow2' format for the device doesn't work:
> 
> error: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor: 2023-07-24T12:54:15.818631Z qemu-system-x86_64: -blockdev {"node-name":"libvirt-1-format","read-only":false,"cache":{"direct":true,"no-flush":false},"driver":"qcow2","file":"libvirt-1-storage"}: Could not read qcow2 header: Invalid argument
> 
> If that is supposed to work, then qemu devs will probably need to know
> about that, if that is not supposed to work, libvirt needs to add a
> check, because the error doesn't tell much. It's also possible I've
> messed up when formatting the image though, as didn't really try to
> figure out what's happening.
> 


That's a good question, and I don't actually know the answer. Were you 
using an actual vdpa block device for your tests or were you using the 
vdpa block simulator kernel module? How did you set it up? Adding 
Stefano to cc for his thoughts.

Jonathon



More information about the libvir-list mailing list