[PATCH 00/26] Migration PULL 2023-07-24
Thomas Huth
thuth at redhat.com
Mon Jul 24 13:28:47 UTC 2023
On 24/07/2023 15.06, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is the migration PULL request.
Maybe it would better to use "PULL" instead of "PATCH" in the subject?
> Now a not on CI, thas has been really bad. After too many problems
> with last PULLS, I decided to learn to use qemu CI. On one hand, it
> is not so difficult, even I can use it O:-)
>
> On the other hand, the amount of problems that I got is inmense. Some
> of them dissapear when I rerun the checks, but I never know if it is
> my PULL request, the CI system or the tests themselves.
I normally peek at https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines to see
whether the problem occurred in one of the last staging CI runs already ...
or I push the master branch to my own repo to see whether it reproduces with
a clean state. That often helps in judging whether it's a new problem or a
pre-existing one.
> This (last) patch is not part of the PULL request, but I have found
> that it _always_ makes gcov fail. I had to use bisect to find where
> the problem was.
>
> https://gitlab.com/juan.quintela/qemu/-/jobs/4571878922
>
> I could use help to know how a change in test/qtest/migration-test.c
> can break block layer tests, I am all ears.
>
> Yes, I tried several times. It always fails on that patch. The
> passes with flying colors.
Can you reproduce it locally by running "make check-block"?
The tests/qemu-iotests/tests/copy-before-write test seems to be doing some
things with snapshots ... maybe that's related?
Thomas
More information about the libvir-list
mailing list