[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] html: Added additional classes to cimv216-interop.mof

[Kaitlin Rupert]

Jay Gagnon wrote:
>> --- a/doc/libvirt-cim.html	Thu Dec 06 11:06:38 2007 +0100
>> +++ b/doc/libvirt-cim.html	Thu Dec 06 11:06:39 2007 +0100
>> @@ -300,6 +300,11 @@ below:</p>
>>  #pragma include ("qualifiers.mof")<br/>
>>  #pragma include ("qualifiers_optional.mof")<br/>
>>  #pragma include ("Core/CIM_ManagedElement.mof")<br/>
>> +#pragma include ("Core/CIM_ManagedSystemElement.mof")<br/>
>> +#pragma include ("Core/CIM_LogicalElement.mof")<br/>
>> +#pragma include ("Core/CIM_EnabledLogicalElement.mof")<br/>
>> +#pragma include ("Core/CIM_System.mof")<br/>
>> +#pragma include ("System/CIM_ComputerSystem.mof")<br/>
>>  #pragma include ("Interop/CIM_RegisteredProfile.mof")<br/>
>>  #pragma include ("Interop/CIM_RegisteredSubProfile.mof")<br/>
>>  #pragma include ("Core/CIM_Dependency.mof")<br/>
>>   
>>     
>
> Looks syntactically sound.  I don't recognize a couple of those classes
> as dual-namespace ones, but I'm not going to second guess our CIM
> Compliance Officer on that. :)  +1
>   
For my own curiosity - I'm not sure why CIM_EnabledLogicalElement.mof 
and CIM_Dependency.mof need to be added.  I understand the need for the 
others though. =)

-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
karupert at us.ibm.com