[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 1 of 3] Initialize libvirt at provider load

Dan Smith danms at us.ibm.com
Mon Nov 19 15:13:17 UTC 2007


HE> This is caused by a non-resolved PN variable. PN is taken as "PN"
HE> and not resolved to the string as in the #define.

Yes, I just looked at the CPP output and I see that it's not correct.
I have tried a bit, but I can't get the existing MIStub macros to
behave like I want, since they assume that their "provider name"
parameter is not a CPP macro :( ...

HE> On the other hand, I sent out a patch to libcmpiutil some minutes
HE> ago, which adds a STD_InstanceMIStub macro to libcmpiutil.h . This
HE> macro avoids now the warning in the original stub macro, which
HE> removes the responsibility from each provider to define it by
HE> itself. The patches below show the difference (first one is yours
HE> with PN approach, second one is removing the PN approach and using
HE> STD_InstanceMIStub macro). 

Yeah, my goal with this was not to simply merge the name in the
prototype and the macro, but rather to unify the name used for
provider with multiple MIStub calls.  If someone updates these in the
future, they could update one and not the other and break things.
However, I don't see an easy way around this.

HE> Now that you touched each MI stub, this might also be a good point
HE> in time to resolve this (now very old ;) ... sorry for my delay)
HE> problem.

Yeah, I can apply and re-roll this patch with just the required
libvirt initialization and changes to use your updated macro.

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms at us.ibm.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/attachments/20071119/ecb41000/attachment.sig>


More information about the Libvirt-cim mailing list