[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] Fix cu_return_foo calls to match new signature

[Jay Gagnon]

Dan Smith wrote:
> DS> I don't think this is all of them.  My count looks like this:
>
> Nevermind.  Duh.  Applied :)
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libvirt-cim mailing list
> Libvirt-cim at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
Heh, I was surprised too.  I actually only realized that half of them
were single instances when I went to replace "list.list" and found
"inst" instead. :)

-- 

-Jay