[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 08 of 12] RAFP: Adoption of changes to std_assoc struct in std_association

[Kaitlin Rupert]

Heidi Eckhart wrote:
> +
> +char* dependent[] = {
> +        "Xen_ResourceAllocationSettingData",
> +        "KVM_ResourceAllocationSettingData",
> +        NULL
> +};
> +
>   
Using -arc Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData in a query doesn't 
work, but using -arc Xen_ResourceAllocationSettingData does work.  
Should Xen_ProcResourceAllocationSettingData, etc also added to the 
list?  The instances we're returning aren't of type 
Xen_ResourceAllocationSettingData, so it seems like we should accept 
result class values that correspond to the class type we return.

However, the Virt_ResourceAllocationSettingData provider trips me up 
more often than it should, so I might be way off base here.  =)

-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
karupert at us.ibm.com