[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 0 of 2] [TEST] bundles of ComputerSystemCreatedIndication tc

[Dan Smith]

GY>   As you said before, it's better to subscribe to a superclass and
GY>   get all three of the lifecycle indications. So I prepare to
GY>   change the test case do the setup for each type in a single file.

Okay.

GY>   Also, the superclass named "CIM_Indication", right?

Yes, I think that's the only common superclass.
 
>> How about a test that subscribes to a Xen indication and then creates
>> a KVM guest to make sure that it doesn't get the KVM indication?
>> 
GY>   You refer to the negative test case to Xen indication?

I'm not sure what you're asking here...

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms at us.ibm.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/attachments/20080403/6e48408c/attachment.sig>