[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 0 of 2] [RFC] First steps in new processor RASD behavior

Jay Gagnon grendel at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Apr 8 19:00:09 UTC 2008


Just want to get this out before I start in on the resource add/mod/del stuff, to see if I'm on the right track.  The idea here is that we are not supporting processor pinning, will support scheduling (weight/limit attributes), and are making Processor RASDs one-per-domain.  Does this look sane?




More information about the Libvirt-cim mailing list