[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 0 of 2] [RFC] First steps in new processor RASD behavior

[Dan Smith]

JG> Just want to get this out before I start in on the resource
JG> add/mod/del stuff, to see if I'm on the right track.  The idea
JG> here is that we are not supporting processor pinning, will support
JG> scheduling (weight/limit attributes), and are making Processor
JG> RASDs one-per-domain.  Does this look sane?

I haven't tested it yet (I can tomorrow), but this looks sane to me.

Thanks!

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms at us.ibm.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/attachments/20080408/6e9e590a/attachment.sig>