[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST].2# update processor id to reflect recent provider changes

Kaitlin Rupert kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Apr 15 01:16:57 UTC 2008


Guo Lian Yun wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Guolian Yun <yunguol at cn.ibm.com>
> # Date 1208138597 25200
> # Node ID ede68ec5664dd564fe55ae9a90243d6e53465003
> # Parent  137e5079c73fcbfc70e6654cee0b3c3eb3c6acd2
> [TEST].2# update processor id to reflect recent provider changes
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun <yunguol at cn.ibm.com>
> 

Sorry Daisy - I didn't realize this patch was a resend of your previous 
patch set.  Sorry for the confusion.  Usually, if a patchset needs to be 
reworked, the entire set is resent.  However, I didn't finish reviewing 
your patches, which caused some confusion.  My mistake there. =)

You can either resend patch 4 (of the previous set), or you can modify 
this patch to just include the changes the ProcRASD related changes to 
suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/SettingsDefine/02_reverse.py.

Either way is fine.  Thanks!
-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com




More information about the Libvirt-cim mailing list