[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST].2# update processor id to reflect recent provider changes
Kaitlin Rupert
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Apr 15 01:16:57 UTC 2008
Guo Lian Yun wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Guolian Yun <yunguol at cn.ibm.com>
> # Date 1208138597 25200
> # Node ID ede68ec5664dd564fe55ae9a90243d6e53465003
> # Parent 137e5079c73fcbfc70e6654cee0b3c3eb3c6acd2
> [TEST].2# update processor id to reflect recent provider changes
>
> Signed-off-by: Guolian Yun <yunguol at cn.ibm.com>
>
Sorry Daisy - I didn't realize this patch was a resend of your previous
patch set. Sorry for the confusion. Usually, if a patchset needs to be
reworked, the entire set is resent. However, I didn't finish reviewing
your patches, which caused some confusion. My mistake there. =)
You can either resend patch 4 (of the previous set), or you can modify
this patch to just include the changes the ProcRASD related changes to
suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/SettingsDefine/02_reverse.py.
Either way is fine. Thanks!
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
More information about the Libvirt-cim
mailing list