[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 4 of 6] [TEST] update processor id in SettingsDefine01~03 to reflect recent provider changes

[Guo Lian Yun]

libvirt-cim-bounces at redhat.com wrote on 2008-04-15 09:02:03:

> > diff -r 682ad781e5b0 -r 248707005ae8 suites/libvirt-
> cim/cimtest/SettingsDefine/02_reverse.py
> > --- a/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/SettingsDefine/02_reverse.py
> Thu Apr 10 18:55:50 2008 -0700
> > +++ b/suites/libvirt-cim/cimtest/SettingsDefine/02_reverse.py
> Thu Apr 10 19:01:00 2008 -0700
> > @@ -186,13 +186,13 @@ def main():
> >
> >      global rasd_devid
> >      rasd_devid = {
> > -            'ProcResourceAllocationSettingData' : '%s/%s' %
> (test_dom, test_vcpus-1),
> > +            'ProcResourceAllocationSettingData' : '%s/%s' %
> (test_dom, 'proc'),
> >              'NetResourceAllocationSettingData'  : '%s/%s' %
> (test_dom, test_mac),
> >              'DiskResourceAllocationSettingData' : '%s/%s' %
> (test_dom, test_disk),
> >              'MemResourceAllocationSettingData'  : '%s/%s' %
> (test_dom, 'mem')}
>
>
> Daisy, can you resend this patch so that it only has this change?
>
  Done it.

> I believe the recent provider changes should have only affected the
> InstanceID of the ProcRASD class, and not the Processor class InstanceID
> as well.
>
> So, the Processor related changes shouldn't be necessary.
> --
> Kaitlin Rupert
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libvirt-cim mailing list
> Libvirt-cim at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/attachments/20080415/fefac25f/attachment.htm>