[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 3 of 3] [TEST] add ElementAllocatedFromPool.02 for KVM & XenFV support

Kaitlin Rupert kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Apr 17 14:44:32 UTC 2008


Guo Lian Yun wrote:
> libvirt-cim-bounces at redhat.com wrote on 2008-04-17 05:37:38:
> 
>  > > +#    Guolian Yun <yunguol at cn.ibm.com>
>  >
>  > Being as most of the test cases will need to be changed from time to
>  > time, we should leave the author's list as is.
>  >
>  > >  test_mem   = 128
>  > >  test_vcpus = 4
>  > > -test_disk  = "xvdb"
>  > >  test_dpath = "foo"
>  > >  disk_file = '/tmp/diskpool.conf'
>  >
>  > This test should use the diskpool support in the provider. This means a
>  > diskpool needs to be created if one doesn't exist already.  Otherwise,
>  > this test fails.
>  >
>  > For RHEL 5.2 - we'll need to ignore the diskpool stuff and use a file.
>  > Since you need to write a function that creates the diskpool, you could
>  > have the function check the version of libvirt and then either create a
>  > diskpool or create diskpool file accordingly (thanks to Dan for the help
>  > with this).
>  >
>   I've just add a function that creates the diskpool now, on the next plan,
>   the general diskpool config function will be moved to a library, I
>   will update all related test. Also, I will create a diskpool file in lib
>   using for RHEL 5.2, then ElementAllocatedFromPool will changed 
> accordingly.
> 
>   Thanks!

I don't see the diskpool function in the patches you sent - is this in a 
separate patch?

Here's the patches I see:
   .3# update network_by_bridge for KVM & XenFV support
   .3# add ElementAllocatedFromPool.01 for KVM & XenFV support
   .4# add ElementAllocatedFromPool.02 for KVM & XenFV support

Am I missing one?  Also, when you send an update, can you add a note to 
the log that indicates what changed between the two patches?

Thanks!

-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com




More information about the Libvirt-cim mailing list