[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] #3 Fix CS 22 to use providers instead of virsh
Kaitlin Rupert
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Jul 22 15:33:21 UTC 2008
>> - status = PASS
>> + status = chk_state(test_dom, options.ip, DEFINE_STATE,
>> options.virt)
>> + if status != PASS:
>> + logger.error("%s not in defined state as expected." %
>> test_dom)
>>
> The log message is misleading. It gives me a feeling that domgst is not
> in defined state and it is expected state for the domgst.
> Can we chop off the "as expected" part?
> or have log stmt something like "%s should have been in defined state" ??
Sure, I'll change it to "%s should have been in defined state" - this
log message is more clear.
Thanks!
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
More information about the Libvirt-cim
mailing list