[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 1 of 7] Add Resource Pool types to svpc_types.h

[Heidi Eckhart]

Dan Smith wrote:
> I know that in several places, we assume that a device type is the
> same as the CIM resource type.  Above, you define CIM_RASD_TYPE_foo to
> CIM_RES_TYPE_foo, presumably to avoid having to touch all the places
> that use the former.  I think to reduce ambiguity and to enforce the
> fact that these must remain the same, it would be better to just
> change CIM_RASD_TYPE_foo to CIM_RES_TYPE_foo everywhere.
>
> Thoughts?
>   
I'm definitely supporting this opinion and will update all providers, if 
the others are fine with using CIM_RES_TYPE_foo in all cases (Device, 
DevicePool, RASD ...).

-- 
Regards

Heidi Eckhart
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center - Open Hypervisor