[Libvirt-cim] Re: CimTest Report for KVM on F9 07-05-2008

[Deepti B Kalakeri]

Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
>>>> SettingsDefine - 02_reverse.py: FAIL
>>> SDS expects InstanceID "testdom/0" instead of "testdom/proc".
>> The VirtualSystemSettingDataComponent association returns ProcRASD 
>> InstanceID of the form "testdom/proc", but the SettingsDefineState 
>> association expects the ProcRASD InstanceID of the form "testdom/0". 
>> I guess this is a known issue ?
>>
>
> The processor test cases were out of sync because processor related 
> changes.  Jay's processor patch went into the tree today.  Can you try 
> again with updated sources?  A few of the test cases will need to be 
> changed to reflect the changes in provider behavior.

I updated the sources today and verified the above tc.
The above tc now passes, the SettingsDefineState association accepts the 
ProcRASD InstanceID of the form. "testdom/proc"