[Libvirt-cim] Re: KVM on Pegasus Test Run Summary for Oct 31 2008 [ with F9 rpm ]

Deepti B Kalakeri deeptik at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sat Nov 1 19:49:16 UTC 2008



Kaitlin Rupert wrote:
> Deepti B Kalakeri wrote:
>>
>>
>> Deepti B Kalakeri wrote:
>>> =================================================
>>> KVM on Pegasus Test Run Summary for Oct 31 2008
>>> =================================================
>>> Distro: Fedora release 9 (Sulphur)
>>> Kernel: 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.x86_64
>>> libvirt: 0.4.4
>>> Hypervisor: QEMU 0.9.1
>>> CIMOM: Pegasus 2.7.0
>>> Libvirt-cim revision: 712
>>> Libvirt-cim changeset: 668097d4b27c
>>> =================================================
>>> FAIL      : 3
>>> XFAIL     : 2
>>> SKIP      : 6
>>> PASS      : 127
>>> -----------------
>>> Total     : 138
>>> =================================================
>>> FAIL Test Summary:
>>> RedirectionService - 01_enum_crs.py: FAIL
>> The tc assumes MaxConcurrentEnabledSAPs = 65535, this is in 
>> accordance with the latest libvirt-cim changes.
>> These changes are not present in the rpm installed on the machine.
>> The provider assigns the following values with the current F9 rpm:
>>
>> 2 * list of *defined* domains
>>
>> and it does not take into account the *active *domains. Is this right ?
>
> Yes - that's correct.  There was a bug in the provider.  Can you work 
> up a fix for this test - you'll need to check the revision number and 
> then have the test check a different value depending on the revision 
> of the the providers.
Fix submitted for this.
>
>>> SystemDevice - 01_forward.py: FAIL
>> This tc is failing due to the recent changes to the devices.py.
>
> Same here for this one.
Fix submitted for this as well.
>
>>> VirtualSystemManagementService - 14_define_sys_disk.py: FAIL
>>>
>
This tc was failing because of the tomof() function of the class 
CIMInstance() was missing the implementation that was required to 
convert the instance to mof representation.
The tc now passes with the latest svn checkout of the pywbem installed 
on the machine.

Thanks and Regards,
Deepti.
> Thanks!
>




More information about the Libvirt-cim mailing list