[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] Fix RASD provider unregistration
Kaitlin Rupert
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Nov 12 17:08:12 UTC 2008
Dan Smith wrote:
> KR> That's a good idea, although you still have the problem of order. The
> KR> intermediate abstract class needs to be first in the list (so that is
> KR> is registered before its subclasses).
>
> It's probably a good idea to unregister the classes in the opposite
> order anyway, don't you think? That way if you have dependencies that
> you have to maintain, you can do that in the list. If we modify
> provider_register.sh to reverse the list if we're doing a de-register,
> then it should be good, right?
>
Yeah, that'd work. Good idea =)
--
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
More information about the Libvirt-cim
mailing list