[Libvirt-cim] Re: Fw: [TEST] Test failure summary for Xen/XenFV with and without sblim base providers with current resource

[Kaitlin Rupert]

My apologies for not responding to this on Friday.

>  >
>  > I'd do the following:
>  >
>  > 1) HostSystem:  01_enum.py  - Enum Linux_ComputerSystem - if this call
>  > returns an instance, then the enum of HostSystem shouldn't return any
>  > instances.  Otherwise, you should get back a HostSystem instance.
> 
>   Which namespace does Linux_ComputerSystem live in? The enum of 
> Linux_ComputerSystem
>   return NULL:
> 
>  [root at elm** ~]# wbemcli ein 
> http://root:password@localhost/root/virt:Linux_ComputerSystem
> *
> * wbemcli: Cim: (5) CIM_ERR_INVALID_CLASS: Linux_ComputerSystem
> *

root/virt is the namespace of the libvirt-cim providers.  The SBLIM 
providers live in root/cimv2

> 
>  Since the namespace of Linux_ComputerSystem is different from the 
> others, how to set
>  CIM_NS twice in one test case? That is to say, I have to set CIM_NS as 
> /root/virt when I enum
>  HostSystem, then the namespace have to be set others when I enum 
> Linux_ComputerSystem in
>  one test case.

This is very similar to what we have to do for the ECTP test cases - 
RegisteredProfile lives in root/interop, while ComputerSystem lives in 
root/virt.

I'd take a look at those test cases for ideas on how to handle multiple 
namespaces in one test.


>  >
>  > 2) For all other tests the depend on a HostSystem instance, do an enum
>  > of HostSystem.  If no instances are returned, do an enum of
>  > Linux_ComputerSystem and use that instance.
> 
ttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim


-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com