[Libvirt-cim] On SLES 11 with SFCB Xen_HostSystem returns no instances

[Medlyn, Dayne (VSL - Ft Collins)]

Jim,

So you are saying that we should not use Xen_HostSystem and that it cannot be relied on?  I am dealing with existing code that references the Xen_HostSystem successfully on SLES10sp2 with libvirt-cim-0.4.1 installed, which is now broken in SLES 11 with libvirt-cim-0.5.2.  The SLES 10sp2 system is running tog-Pegasus where the SLES 11 system is running SFCB.  I was hoping for compatibility from one release to another.  Perhaps the choice of using Xen_HostSystem was a bad one?

I am trying to determine if I have found a bug in what is included in SLES 11 or if I may be missing some unidentified dependency or configurations.  Thoughts?

Thanks for your insights.

Dayne



> -----Original Message-----
> From: libvirt-cim-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:libvirt-cim-
> bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jim Fehlig
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 3:56 PM
> To: List for discussion and development of libvirt CIM
> Subject: Re: [Libvirt-cim] On SLES 11 with SFCB Xen_HostSystem returns
> no instances
> 
> Medlyn, Dayne (VSL - Ft Collins) wrote:
> > In the SLES 11 distribution Novell is distributing libvirt-cim-0.5.2-
> 8.46 and registering it with the SFCB CIMOM.  Does anyone know why the
> enumeration of Xen_HostSystem returns no instances?  I could not find
> any mention of this on the mailing list.
> >
> 
> The host is Linux_ComputerSystem instance in /root/cimv2.  VMs are
> associated to the host with Xen_HostedDependency association.
> 
> Jim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Libvirt-cim mailing list
> Libvirt-cim at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim