[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH 0 of 4] [TEST][RFC] Added new tc to verify remote live migration.

[Kaitlin Rupert]

>>
>> This set looks good!  I haven't had a chance to test on Xen yet.  
>> Also, if you are planning to include all of the migration types in one 
>> test, you'll want to change the test name from 
>> 06_remote_live_migration.py to something more generic.
>>
> I would prefer to have different test cases for different types, otherwise
> tracking the issues would be more problematic,
> the test case will be lengthier and complex
> keeping the scenarios separate gives a ready to use tc for verifying 
> regression for different migration types if any.
> 
> Thoughts ??
> 

These are good arguments.  I'm fine with either approach.  The single 
test approach means there is less code duplication across multiple tests 
(because each test will basically be the same, right?).  So it's less of 
a maintenance headache if things change later on.

-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com