[Libvirt-cim] What does NumberOfBlocks and ConsumableBlocks in the Xen_Memory class represent?

[Medlyn, Dayne (VSL - Ft Collins)]

Kaitlin,

Do you know if I can rely on a standard format for the Revision field in VirtualSystemManagementService class?  Looking at the code I see it is provided as a build variable "-DLIBVIRT_CIM_RV=" that gets set in the acinclude.m4 script.  I suppose any of the distributions can label this any way they see fit.  So far I have seen:

SLES11: 0.5.2
RHEL5.3: 613+

Our 0.4.1 build: 590
Current testing builds: 875

Any thought on any standard format?  Do you know what the build number was for 0.5.1 (somewhere between 590 and 613)?  At the moment I am planning to handle the x.x.x and x\D+ cases.  If anyone has any other thoughts or experiences I am open to them.

Thanks.

Dayne

   

> >
> > Just for confirmation, does this mean that for anything 0.5.1 and
> newer I should expect:
> >
> > -NumberOfBlocks the maximum memory allocated to the guest
> > -ConsumableBlocks the memory currently assigned to the guest
> >
> > And for anything older than 0.5.1 I should expect:
> >
> > -NumberOfBlocks the memory currently assigned to the guest
> > -ConsumableBlocks the maximum memory allocated to the guest
> 
> Yes, that's correct.  We're one the same page here.  Sorry for the
> confusing detour there. ;)
> 
> 
> --
> Kaitlin Rupert
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Libvirt-cim mailing list
> Libvirt-cim at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-cim