[Libvirt-cim] [PATCH] [TEST] Adding verification for DestroySystem() of the domain

[Kaitlin Rupert]

>>
>> I took a look at this test, and you're right - the reason it's failing 
>> is because DestroySystem() is also undefined the guest. So the answer 
>> here is to modify the test so that it doesn't call undefine(). Also, 
>> make sure the guest isn't in the inactive domain list either.
>>
>> Not sure why you want to XFAIL the test, as DestroySystem() is doing 
>> what is expected.
>>
> I thought DestroySystem() is equivalent to "virsh destroy" command which 
> would just destroy a running domain which was defined and started.
> 
> 

Nope, DestroySystem() does a "virsh destroy" and "virsh undefine".  If 
you look at the System Virtualization Profile (DSP1042) under the 
heading "     8.2.2 CIM_VirtualSystemManagementService.DestroySystem( ) 
Method (Conditional)", DestroySystem() is defined as:

"The execution of the DestroySystem( ) method shall effect the 
destruction of the referenced virtual system
and all related virtual system configurations, including snapshots."

-- 
Kaitlin Rupert
IBM Linux Technology Center
kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com