[Libvirt-cim] cimtest results.

[Sharad Mishra]

"Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)" <eblima at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote on 10/27/2011
05:17:58 AM:

> "Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)" <eblima at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 10/27/2011 05:17 AM
>
> Please respond to
> eblima at br.ibm.com
>
> To
>
> Sharad Mishra/Beaverton/IBM at IBMUS
>
> cc
>
> eblima at br.ibm.com, Chip Vincent/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS, wayne
> <xiawenc at linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Gareth S Bestor/Poughkeepsie/IBM at IBMUS
>
> Subject
>
> Re: cimtest results.
>
> On 10/26/2011 08:07 PM, snmishra at us.ibm.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see bunch of tests failing after I get cimtest from upstream and
apply
> > the following patches -
> >
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/2011-October/msg00051.html
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/2011-October/msg00052.html
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/2011-October/msg00045.html
> >
> >
> > If I run cimtest from rev 879 (which is upstream minus latest 4
patches)
> > and compare the results with the run using latest upstream plus above
> > three patches I see following extra failures -
> >
> > VirtualSystemManagementService - 08_modifyresource.py: FAIL
> > VirtualSystemManagementService - 09_procrasd_persist.py: FAIL
> > VirtualSystemManagementService - 11_define_memrasdunits.py: FAIL
> > VirtualSystemManagementService - 31_unset_netrasd.py: FAIL
> > VirtualSystemManagementService - 32_modify_cdrom_media.py: FAIL
> > KVMRedirectionSAP - 01_enum_KVMredSAP.py: FAIL
> >
> > I understand that 31_* and 32_* are new tests and that is the reason I
> > did not see them in my run with older rev. But we need to figure out
why
> > these tests are failing.
> >
>
> The buggy patch is 883 ([TEST] XenKvmLib: Add cdrom device description
> to domain) and it looks weird that you actually ran revision 879 as it
> should not include VSMS 31 and 32. Can you try again with revision 882?

When I wrote "older rev" above, I meant rev 879.
I did not see 31_ and 32_ in rev 879 and that is understandable since those
tests were added in later rev.
I am trying to understand why above tests are failing with 883 + cimtest
patches on list (the three I pointed out above)?

-Sharad

>
> Best regards, Etrunko
>
> --
> Eduardo de Barros Lima
> Software Engineer, Open Virtualization
> Linux Technology Center - IBM/Brazil
> eblima at br.ibm.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-cim/attachments/20111027/bbe6f933/attachment.htm>