[libvirt-users] libvirt-users Digest, Vol 34, Issue 35

[Gao Yongwei]

2012/10/31 Chandana De Silva <chandana at desilva.id.au>

> You _can_ do NAT.
>
> Set up a  different libvirt network on each machine, like this;
> 10.128.80.65 will have a libvirt network 192.168.65.0/24
> 10.128.80.66 will have a libvirt network 192.168.66.0/24
>
> Set up each of these networks as routed networks.
>
> Now set up routing/iptables rules on each host to send traffic to each
> other, and NAT into the internal routed network
>
> On 31/10/12 01:46, libvirt-users-request at redhat.**com<libvirt-users-request at redhat.com>wrote:
>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:10:55 +0000
>> From: ??<zhang_zhang at live.com>
>> To:<libvirt-users at redhat.com>
>> Subject: [libvirt-users] Can VMs on different machines communicate
>>         with each other without IP?
>> Message-ID:<BLU172-**W4666B32A6C9C8E75734C67FC620@**phx.gbl>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>       I confront a somehow strange situation:
>>       I have two machines configured with ip 10.128.80.65 and
>> 10.128.80.66 respectively. Each has several VMs running on it. The problem
>> is that I have no more ip ( such as 10.128.80.67...) to allocate to VMs,
>> but VMs need to communicate with each other even when they are on different
>> machines.
>>       Two network options exist: NAT and bridge.
>>       1) NAT
>>           But VMs on different machine cannot communicate with each other.
>>       2)bridge
>>           But there is no more ip for vm to be bridged to host machine.
>>       Is there any other way to work around this problem?
>>
>>
>> many thanks!
>>
>
> you can custom your iptable rules to solve it,i've noticed that you've got
a method which from my blog,good luck!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20121101/4d2aa719/attachment.htm>