[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [libvirt-users] SCSI/IDE Devices in Guest



On 10/30/2012 08:46 AM, Douglas Russell wrote:
> I'm experimenting with how to attach storage to a guest virtual machine (I
> sent another message to th elist about that as it's slightly different)
> 
> Looking in the XML files for my virtual machine, I see this:
> 
> <disk type='file' device='disk'>
>   <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2'/>
>   <source file='/vm/myvm/tmpeuiVc9.qcow2'/>
>   <target dev='hda' bus='ide'/>
>   <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' unit='0'/>
> </disk>
> 
> However, /dev/hda is not a device in the guest. It is /dev/sda. It's not
> really a problem in it's own right, but it's one of several connected
> things which don't make sense. Is there some explanation for this?

The <target dev='...'> designation is a hint, and there for you to track
things in the host, but does not necessarily reflect the name that the
guest will choose for the same device (there is NO way for the host to
force what the guest names things).

However, for SCSI devices in the guest, you probably want to use <disk
type='block' device='lun'> rather than type='file' device='disk'.

[Caveat: I haven't used SCSI devices in my guests yet]

> 
> I believe this is linked to some weirdness when I attach some extra storage
> like so:
> 
> virsh attach-disk myvm /dev/lvm-group1/mystorage sdb --driver qemu
> --persistent
> 
> This adds the following stanza:
> 
> <disk type='block' device='disk'>
>   <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/>
>   <source dev='/dev/lvm-group1/mystorage'/>
>   <target dev='sdb' bus='scsi'/>
>   <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' unit='1'/>
> </disk>
> 
> Looks about right. In the guest though, it pushes /dev/sda (root and swap
> are here on sda1 and sda2) upto /dev/sdb (sdb1 and sdb2). Somehow it still
> boots correctly despite fstab referrencing /dev/sda1 and /dev/sda2 for /
> and swap. The new /dev/sda is this storage I tried to add as sdb. What
> could be causing this?

Again, names in the XML don't have to reflect names chosen by the guest.
 Beyond that, I don't have quite enough experience in this area of the
code to give a definitive answer, but at least wanted to throw out an
answer while you wait to see if anyone else also replies.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]