[libvirt-users] Sanlock gives up lock when VM is paused
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Thu Jan 31 20:03:44 UTC 2013
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:02:15AM -0800, Michael Rodrigues wrote:
> On 1/31/2013 10:40 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:35:17AM -0800, Michael Rodrigues wrote:
> >>Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >>I thought migration might be the reason, but I'm still not seeing
> >>the behavior you describe with regards to pausing. I saw the
> >>following behavior:
> >>
> >>1. Created VM on node 1
> >>2. Started VM on node 1
> >>3. Migrated VM to node 2, node 1 is now shutdown, node 2 is running
> >>4. I paused node 2
> >>5. I started node 1, no error
> >>6. Paused node 1
> >>7. Unpaused node 2, no err
> >>
> >>I thought maybe the original VM had to be paused first, so I tried
> >>that as well:
> >>
> >>1. Created VM on node 1
> >>2. Started VM on node 1
> >>3. Migrated to node 2, node 1 is now shutdown, node 2 is running
> >>4. I shutdown node 2 instead of pausing
> >>5. I started node 1
> >>6. I paused node 1
> >>7. Started node 2
> >>8. Paused node 2
> >>9. Started node 1
> >Hmm, that isn't supposed to be possible. When you paused node 1
> >in step 6, it was supposed to record the lease version number.
> >When you resume in step 9, the version number should mis-match
> >due to step 7, and thus sandlock ought to have caused an error
> >at step 9. If that didn't happen, then I believe we have a bug
> Should I file a report? I'm not really a developer but I can provide
> whatever information is necessary for a proper report. I don't have
> RHEL or a bugzilla account.
Yes, please do file a bug report including this scenario to
reproduce
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the libvirt-users
mailing list