[libvirt-users] Pools are not persistent

[Daniel Bareiro]

Ho, Eric.

On Tuesday, 04 June 2013 09:40:45 -0600,
Eric Blake wrote:

> >>> This is what I see in libvirtd.log:
> >>>
> >>> 2013-06-02 01:05:29.709+0000: 19289: info : libvirt version: 0.9.12

> Relatively old...

> > This have to do with a bug when using libvirt on a 32-bit operating
> > system?
> > 
> > http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-November/thread.html#01048

> and since that thread discusses a fix that wasn't until commit 37a1012
> (0.10.0), you are correct that your version of libvirtd has a bug, and
> that upgrading would fix things for you.

Taking advantage of the new feature "multiarch" of Debian, I've migrated
the VMHost to amd64 architecture and after that, I did not have this
problem.

Still, I see the <owner> </owner> and <group> </group> in the
configuration file created after creating a pool once migrated to
libvirt-bin amd64, have values that do not seem to correspond with UID
and GID. This is normal?

<pool type='logical'>
  <name>LVM</name>
  <uuid>6f24dd66-565d-53fa-9b21-41f6b69de757</uuid>
  <capacity unit='bytes'>979185434624</capacity>
  <allocation unit='bytes'>431644213248</allocation>
  <available unit='bytes'>547541221376</available>
  <source>
    <device path='/dev/md2'/>
    <name>vms</name>
    <format type='lvm2'/>
  </source>
  <target>
    <path>/dev/vms</path>
    <permissions>
      <mode>0700</mode>
      <owner>4294967295</owner>
      <group>4294967295</group>
    </permissions>
  </target>
</pool>


Thanks for your reply.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
Ing. Daniel Bareiro - GNU/Linux registered user #188.598
Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux with uptime:
16:43:32 up 25 days,  3:07, 12 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20130609/5c1406ba/attachment.sig>