[libvirt-users] libvirtd using 11GB

Jarod. w work.iec23801 at gmail.com
Wed May 8 09:42:29 UTC 2013


2013/4/16 Michal Privoznik <mprivozn at redhat.com>

> On 16.04.2013 11:29, Alex Leonhardt wrote:
> > Ah great, thanks!
> >
> > Alex
>
> In general, it can be a bit difficult to determine the exact commit
> which fixes problem you are seeing, because it depends on you concrete
> use case. However, you can try running libvirtd with valgrind and see
> where libvirtd leaks the most. This as disadvantage of libvirtd running
> a bit slower but on the other hand, if it is such huge leak even a
> little while should do. Maybe you will discover a new leak :)
>
I met this issue.thanks


>
> Michal
>
> _______________________________________________
> libvirt-users mailing list
> libvirt-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users
>



-- 
---
Best Regards
Jarod.W
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20130508/3ca8ce64/attachment.htm>


More information about the libvirt-users mailing list