[libvirt-users] 答复: What is the difference between running "virt-manager" and "sudo virt-manager"?

王成武 chengwu.wang at net263.com
Tue Oct 28 01:05:59 UTC 2014



发件人: Allen Qiu [mailto:my1stbox at 163.com] 
发送时间: 2014年10月27日 16:31
收件人: libvirt-users at redhat.com
抄送: 王成武; 'Bin Liu'; zoubinbin100 at 163.com
主题: What is the difference between running "virt-manager" and "sudo virt-manager"?


Hi all,


What is the difference between starting virt-manager by "virt-manager" and by "sudo virt-manager"? It seems that there are two copy of virt-manager running in the background. 


When I run "virt-manager", I got a error of "Unable to open a connection to the libvirt management daemon. Libvirt URI is: qemu:///system Verify that: - The 'libvirtd' daemon has been started". 


Whereas when I run "sudo virt-manager", I got a error of "Error starting Virtual Machine Manager: Failed to contact configuration server; some possible causes are that you need to enable TCP/IP networking for ORBit, or you have stale NFS locks due to a system crash. See  <http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/> http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/ for information."


How should I deal with the two issues respectively? Is there any drawback by simply running "virt-manager"?








Allen Qiu

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20141028/3c2248bb/attachment.htm>

More information about the libvirt-users mailing list