[libvirt-users] vms not persistent after upgrading to f22?

[Rich Megginson]

On 08/27/2015 11:55 PM, Spanky Horawitz wrote:
> Have you tried:
> virsh define <xml definition file>
>
> I thought it odd too that virsh create <xml defintion file> only 
> created a temp instance.  But the first command did what I needed with 
> persistence.

Yes, that works.  I can use define then start to do what create does.

Thanks!

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From*: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn at redhat.com 
> <mailto:Michal%20Privoznik%20%3cmprivozn at redhat.com%3e>>
> *To*: Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com 
> <mailto:Rich%20Megginson%20%3crmeggins at redhat.com%3e>>, 
> libvirt-users at redhat.com <libvirt-users at redhat.com 
> <mailto:%22libvirt-users at redhat.com%22%20%3clibvirt-users at redhat.com%3e>>
> *Cc*: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina at redhat.com 
> <mailto:Pavel%20Hrdina%20%3cphrdina at redhat.com%3e>>
> *Subject*: Re: [libvirt-users] vms not persistent after upgrading to f22?
> *Date*: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 06:40:13 +0200
>
> On 27.08.2015 20:28, Rich Megginson wrote:
> > With f21 and earlier, I could just call virt-install to create VMs, and
> > they would persist after reboot.
> > After upgrading to f22, when I shut off a VM, it is removed, and has to
> > be recreated.
> > How can I get VMs to persist? Is there a virsh create or virt-install
> > switch to do this?
>
> Sounds like a virt-install bug to me. Consider posting it to
> virt-tools-list at redhat.com <mailto:virt-tools-list at redhat.com>. Or maybe Pavel [CC'ed] has some thoughts on
> this.
>
> Michal
>
> _______________________________________________
> libvirt-users mailing list
> libvirt-users at redhat.com <mailto:libvirt-users at redhat.com>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20150828/df4b9a42/attachment.htm>