[libvirt-users] So why does "destroy" not actually destroy?

KARR, DAVID dk068x at att.com
Tue Jul 14 00:51:31 UTC 2015


I thought it odd that if I have a running VM and I do "virsh destroy" it results in a VM that is "shut off".  To ACTUALLY destroy a VM, you have to follow that with "undefine".  Could someone elaborate on how we ended up with these slightly confusing semantics?




More information about the libvirt-users mailing list