[libvirt-users] OVS / KVM / libvirt / MTU

Sven Vogel S.Vogel at ewerk.com
Mon Jul 29 19:23:03 UTC 2019


Hi Michal,

Thanks for your answer.

I don’t understand why an interface created without mtu gets only 1500 visible in the virtual machine but if I create an interface with mtu higher than 1500 e.g. 2000 the bridge will change too. Before the bridge was e.g. by 9000.
I ask because you wrote if I don’t set an mtu of the interface I will get the mtu of the bridge. But it seems so.

Can you clarify it a little better for me?


Cheers

Sven

Von meinem iPhone gesendet


__

Sven Vogel
Teamlead Platform

EWERK RZ GmbH
Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig
P +49 341 42649 - 11
F +49 341 42649 - 18
S.Vogel at ewerk.com
www.ewerk.com

Geschäftsführer:
Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Frank Richter
Registergericht: Leipzig HRB 17023

Zertifiziert nach:
ISO/IEC 27001:2013
DIN EN ISO 9001:2015
DIN ISO/IEC 20000-1:2011

EWERK-Blog | LinkedIn | Xing | Twitter | Facebook

Auskünfte und Angebote per Mail sind freibleibend und unverbindlich.

Disclaimer Privacy:
Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) ist vertraulich und nur für den Empfänger bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der bestimmungsgemäße Empfänger sein, ist Ihnen jegliche Offenlegung, Vervielfältigung, Weitergabe oder Nutzung des Inhalts untersagt. Bitte informieren Sie in diesem Fall unverzüglich den Absender und löschen Sie die E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) von Ihrem System. Vielen Dank.

The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you.
> Am 29.07.2019 um 13:20 schrieb Michal Privoznik <mprivozn at redhat.com>:
>
>> On 7/23/19 8:00 PM, Sven Vogel wrote:
>> Hey there,
>> I hope anyone can bring some light in the following problem.
>> <interface type='bridge'>
>> <source bridge='cloudbr0'/>
>> <mtu size='2000'/>
>> <mac address='02:00:74:76:00:01'/>
>> <model type='virtio'/>
>> <virtualport type='openvswitch'>
>> </virtualport>
>> <vlan trunk='no'>
>> <tag id='2097'/>
>> </vlan><link state='up'/>
>> </interface>
>> we have an base bridge for example and cloudbr0. After we add an mtu to the vm bridge here it seems the base bridge gets the same mtu like the vnet adapter.
>> Is this normal behaviour of libvirt together with OVS?
>
> I wouldn't say it is 'normal', but this behaviour is not specific to libvirt. I mean, if you create a tap device yourself by hand and then plug it into an ovs bridge the same thing will happen. If you don't want to change MTU of the bridge then just don't set it for <interface/> and libvirt will copy whatever MTU the bridge has over to the new TAP device.
>
> Michal




More information about the libvirt-users mailing list