Libgfapi gone too?

[lejeczek]

On 10/12/2021 13:13, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:28:29AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:18:16AM +0000, lejeczek wrote:
>>> Guys, @redhat and all the others responsible - Official (but also blogs,
>>> changelogs, man pages, etc) docs have begun to form -
>>> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9-beta
>>> Please put all those _critical_ changes everywhere and admin might go first
>>> to read for what's new & different, make it underscored + in-bold I'd
>>> suggest.
>> I would ultimately expect this kind of thing to be documented in the
>> release notes, under some kind of heading like "incompatible changes"
>> or similar.  We're only at 9.0-beta though, so docs are not all
>> fully fleshed out yet.
> The document you're looking for is
>
>    https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9-beta/html-single/considerations_in_adopting_rhel_9/index
>
> and the part specific to virtualization is
>
>    https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9-beta/html-single/considerations_in_adopting_rhel_9/index#ref_changes-to-virtualization_assembly_virtualization
>
> The removal of SPICE is mentioned, but that of glusterfs isn't. If
> you look at
>
>    https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9-beta/html-single/considerations_in_adopting_rhel_9/index#removed-packages_assembly_changes-to-packages
>
> you'll see that the qemu-kvm-block-gluster and
> libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-gluster packages have been dropped, but
> it's questionable whether this is prominent enough for people to
> actually notice.
>
really??
That was one of the most useful & practical bits - having 
libvirt&qemu to make use of GlusterFS without having to 
"expose" GF volumes to the filesystem. (everybody who do 
virt+glusterfs I know, do have it that way)

thanks, L.