Two netlink patches

[Serge Hallyn]

Good point.  New patch is attached.  If there are no more issues, I will
send it out to lkml tomorrow.

(My original thought was to wait until we discuss more in-depth whether
to move to non-netlink interface for control, but really that discussion
would not be fair if we start from a known bad netlink implementation :)

thanks,
-serge

On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 15:02 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 December 2004 12:43, Steve Grubb wrote:
> > I'm still looking at it. I think I do see one change to the permchecks
> > patch. I'll get back with you on it.
> 
> OK. For the permchecks patch, doesn't AUDIT_GET need to be handled in the 
> switch() in cap_netlink_audit_check & the dummy version similar to 
> AUDIT_LIST?
> 
> That's the only issue I have with this patch.
> 
> -Steve Grubb
> 
> --
> Linux-audit mailing list
> Linux-audit at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
> 
-- 
Serge Hallyn <serue at us.ibm.com>